I think this article underplays the long-term risk even if we cannot quantify it precisely. The USA can afford to and should take much more aggressive measures to mitigate the risk including things like raising gasoline taxes, ending the use of coal, encouraging (and subsidizing) the use of nuclear, wind and solar and supporting public transportation to pick a few options.
This article may leave people feeling that there is no urgency here.
What does that or the article have to do with data centers, fishers or hunters or teddy's conservation work? What does it have anything to do with humans or right or left? It's just regurgitating exactly what the first article argued against. I feel the exact urgency as I did 10 years ago and 20 years ago.
I think this article underplays the long-term risk even if we cannot quantify it precisely. The USA can afford to and should take much more aggressive measures to mitigate the risk including things like raising gasoline taxes, ending the use of coal, encouraging (and subsidizing) the use of nuclear, wind and solar and supporting public transportation to pick a few options.
This article may leave people feeling that there is no urgency here.
What does that or the article have to do with data centers, fishers or hunters or teddy's conservation work? What does it have anything to do with humans or right or left? It's just regurgitating exactly what the first article argued against. I feel the exact urgency as I did 10 years ago and 20 years ago.